My bulling government conspiracy theory

    In a sick, twisted sort of way bullying has been society undercover reformation system for years. Society comes out with an ideal type of person the want all all to act like. Adults teach their children to act as this ideal person should. The child goes to school , and sees another child acting or looking differently than the social norms dictate the child should, as to conform to the ideal person. Child picks on sed other child to try to get them to stop this unattractive quality by changing themselves either physically or physiologically .Because this child is in his key stages of development, it is easier to manipulate or change the way he thinks, looks, and acts. The child who is picked on either changes themselves to meet this new criteria, or unforchantly in some cases, kills himself because he is unable to. Society is now rid of the non-ideal person and thus it has become more ideal. This is how the system works ideally (of course, there are always those who will reiset reformation regardless of what the system does, but that isn't what they want ) Children are (and have been throughout history) a tool that the government and the media are using to regulate how they want society to be. And neither of them even know it.

That's just how the system works.It's how the system has always worked. Its sick, twisted, and has been covertly going on for centuries. It's how society maintains its political correctness and its social norms. Subliminally. Threw children . Threw what we've now came to call bullying.

Even though its a sick twisted cruel system, it still works. Without it we'd have anarchy.Let me explain. In a world without established social norms and without political correctness, it would be impossible to decide as a society what it right and wrong. It would start out with simple ideas, then it would move into politics, then it would move into actions. In a world without a pr-established definition of right and wrong, who could say that rape and child molestation are wrong? Both of those crimes are highly disdained by society because of their high emotional and psychological impact. Simply put, there looked at as such heinous crimes because there morally wrong. Without a common definition of what's morally right and wrong , a society starts to loose order, and turns into an anarchy. Now one may wonder what would happen if instead of being subliminally reforming society threw bullying with our children.

What if instead the government just used laws to force people into acting and behaving in the ideal way they see fit? The politically correct way? I present to you , Nazi Germany. A country who did just that. They used laws to force people to act/look/think in ways which they deemed politically correct. They even went to far as to KILL anyone who didn't comply to those standards. Bypassing the system lead to a dictatorship, and eventually their defeat and a demonization of all they stood for, as a warning to society not to attempt anything like this again. That's what happens when you try to use the government power and laws to force people how to think. Similar situations can be demonstrated in both Stalin's Russia, and the terror and the comity of public safety during the french revolution. That's why a system like this could never work as a functioning society, at least not for a long time.

The system of bullying has help run our society and define how people should look and act for years. Some may say that the solution to this would be "anti-bullying programs" To which I say is a horrible idea, possibly even worse than a dictatorship. Here's why. Anti-bullying programs rely on the logic that bullies= bad people. That might not look so bad except its followed up with "everyone in this classroom has been bullied at some time in their life." "everyone who has been bulled is a good person . Bullys are bad peaple. bullys desive to be punished.That gives peaple like adam laza a sence of justification, because the media makes it seem like he's entitled to vengeance and to justice .Some clame that the reason behind adam laza's psycology was seveire mentaly  ilness. But if one tryeis to look further into this, he will discover that none of that has officaly been confermed. Furthermore illnesses that he has been speculated to have are not at all rare of severe, there illneses like Asbergers Sindrome ( a form of autism that meny peasple his age (((including mysef) have, and 1% of americans ages 3-17 have) , ADD or ADHD (wich up to 20% of americans have , including myself) and OCD (again 1% of america) .Though these precenages may seem small, they are far from uncomon. To blame the reasion for the newtown shooting on adam laza having such a commen ,controlable ilness, is both propostoras and colpleatly onfair to others of those groups.What I therorise is the true cause dehind it was he kept hearing socity ( reflected opon by the meadia) telling him he was wrnged , and there are too many horable peaple out there and he deseved revenge.So he took it out on those children in newtown. And how did the media respond to this you may ask. They immediately rushed to label him as a horrible person, a bully, and went on to say that stricter measures must be taken to eliminate (change or dive to suicide) these types of people from society. Because of this , they GAINED more control , not just over guns and stuff like that , but it gave them a leg up on controlling, and eventually eliminating our freedom of speech ,by demonising those who didn't think extreme measures were necessary. They labeled him as a horrible person, and used it as justification to eliminate more horrible people (bullies) threw their propaganda induced bullying programs and PSA's. These programs are even slyer that the old system because they work like this :

1) kid is convinced he was morally wronged and that he is in the right and deserves vengeance

2)kid commits an atrocity (such as a school shooting to eliminate those who he believed wronged him aka the "bad people" or "bullies"

3)media uses this as a further excuse to enforce things for the "greater good" aka the terms in which they see best fit for a "better " society

4) from then on they define themselves as the heros and anyone who disagrees is demonised and steps are taken (or are in the process of being taken) to silence them , or make them look like villains

5)Emotional appeal is used , and anyone who does not approve of going to extreme measures to eliminate the “bad people” (bullies) or says that this is an over reaction is labeled as a “bully” as well.

6) At this point the media now has more control over regulating social norms and what is perceived as right and wrong then the did to begin with. Though they do not yet have the power to silence their opponents  completely, they use what power they do have to villainize and label all who oppose to look like enemies of (what they want to be conceived as) the greater good.

7) Now that stricter labels have been implemented , the media makes the urgency of “defeating the bullies” look grater and there cause look more justified.That leads to people like adam lanza being even MORE convinced that they are in the right. The cycle repeats itself again

8) the media has more premis to draw the bad people from now that the likelihood for them thinking there in the right has gone up . They use this to even FURTHER enhance its definition of what is morally right and wrong

9) The cycle continues to repeat, and the media and government gain more and more power along the way. The press and politicians start putting into question whether limitations on free speech should be implemented (obviously they are in favor of this , because that means they can regulate what's right and wrong unopposed , but they treat it like its a necessity because of tragedy and they have no other choice.)

10) Societies freedom of speech and individuality will be controlled in a way very similar to that of nazi germany. The only exception is the process by which this is achieved will be gradual instead of sudden. I like to call this process gradual extremism in which a government and or society slowly and subliminally takes away freedoms until the country has lost its freedoms completely to the government. Freedom of speech will be striped away for what they consider “ the greater good” and freedom of religion will suffer the same fate soon after. People will no longer be able to speak, act,think or feel in anyway the government deems morally unjust. That includes freedom of religion, because they will start to feel as if religion leads to too much controversy, and controversy leads to bullying, as well as anything else even remotely controversial.Imagine a world were simply mentioning the word “god” is a crime. Thats where this is headed.

11) People will FINALLY figure out what's going on , but by then it will be too late to do anything about it.

12) Riots and protests will start breaking out in the streets and the government will be “forced” to make all the rioters , or what they call the “bullies” disappear (by now you probably know by disappear a mean physical force them to change, or kill them) They will say it was necessary to get rid of the bad people for the sake of the good people, and again ,say its for the greater good.Everyone who is left will be left living in either terror, repression, or ignorance.

    The most fundamental right of humanity , freedom to speak, to feel, to THINK,will be striped away by the government. Men and women will no longer have the freedom to have their own hopes, their own dreams, choices, aspirations and emotions. The right to be alive, not just living as in your eating and your organs are functioning properly, but the right to make your own choices and pursue happiness. The right to liberty, and to freedom. For is there not a freedom more important than the freedom to be yourself? The right to speak freely is the most important right of all of the rights in the constitution. Is it not having feelings and emotion and expressing it not what makes us all uniquely human? Without our own feelings and individuality we are no different than machines. It’s feelings and individuality that truly makes us human and alive. And what use is having those emotions if you can express them . One simply can’t imagine living in a world like that and still feeling free or feeling happily. Its like a nightmare. and yet there is chance of it becoming reality if we don't do something about it.

Though the programs themselves may be a complete sham and a conspiracy , it doesn't make the cause any more justified.What is “bullying” anyways? According to google, the definition of bullying is “use superior strength or influence to intimidate (someone), typically to force him or her to do what one wants”.How exactly does one differentiate between “bullying” and mere conflict between 2 or more people. The answer? You can't.The term bullying is just too broad and nonspecific to actually mean anything beyond that , and the exceptions to “traditional bullying circumstances” (bill stole my lunch money, that sort of stuff) far outway traditional circumstances . “Every circumstance of bullying is unique” i heard my teacher say once. If that is so then what do they all have in common anyways aside from just conflict. The answer , its bullying is conflict except with a lot more labeling of thing as “good and bad” “ right and wrong” “bullies and victims” Scene when does the government and the media have the authority to dictate what's morally right and wrong?! THEY DON’T , NOR SHOULD THEY EVER! One might ask “ but isn't thats what laws are?” My answer, no. They (the government , not the media) have the authority to dictate what's LEGALLY right and wrong. Whats the difference one may ask? Things that are illegal are that way because it damages the right to a U.S. citizen's life, liberty , and pursuit of happyness. AND THATS IT! THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT ALOUD TO MAKE A LAW ON THE PREMISE THAT SOMETHING IS RIGHT OR WRONG! Allow me to elaborate. Lets use murder as an example. The government is allowed to make a law against murder as the reason they give for making that law is helps secure the safety and rights of americans , and not an emotion based reason without logic ex: “because its wrong” The court and government is not allowed to decide and make laws and legal decisions based on morality , only on what's best and what's fair for the American people. They are here to decide what's best, not what's right. That doesn't mean that there not here to enact justice , because they are. They are just not at the liberty to determine the morals and base our liberty on that.

    The cause , “to end bullying” , is pointless because what is bullying rely and truly , aside from mere conflict? Anyone who says that its possible for everyone in the world to get along is either naive or lying. There is no possible way to avoid all conflict. Think for a second, do we as a society truly desire a world without conflict? I’m not very poetic but nevertheless i'm going to say life is like a story , and what kind of story is one without conflict . How interesting and desirable could that book truly be? Furthermore , if we lived in a world without conflict , we wouldn't have anything else to compare it to , so everything would be dull. There wouldn't be any motivation or desire because it would be needed. We wouldn't know happiness , because we don't know what its like to feel sad. We wouldn't know love because we wouldn't know what its like to feel unloved and lonely. We wouldn't have secrets that we share with our closest friends and lovers about our experiences , about our sins and our pleasures , our ambitions and our dreams. A world without conflict is one without adventure, without meaning. Come to think of it , its almost as bad as the dystopia. Almost. So do you REALLY want to put an end to all conflict? I don't.After all,  how is one to know how great it is to feel worthy unless they have a time to compare it to when they did not.

    Another thing I find undesirable about bullying programs (and society in general) is there strange obsession with labeling things and people as good and bad. Personally, it fascinates me how in society people are so quick to label those whom they find undesirable as “villains” or “bullies” or “bad people”. I personally chose not to think this way , and believe that people are simply people , and there is no one on this earth (nor has there ever been) who is completely evil. Regardless of what I believe , the programs and the people behind them are entitled to their belief . However, what I have a problem with is them forcing their beliefs on to me , without my approval. I don't believe in the concept of people being good and bad and labeling people so I shouldn't be forced to participate. Yet for some reason I still am. Not only do they try to force me to sit threw a whole bunch of what i know is a propaganda conspiracy,and when I tried to speak up for what I believe in , I was accused of being a “bully” and promoting “bullying” but they even tried to make me signe a contact! The contract stated that i “ won't bully anyone and if i see “bullying” i will report it” . Well I believe the term bullying is much too broad and vague to sign a legal contract like this. And in about a week I’ll have to sit through that again. Its sick. I’m refusing to take part in such a program and refusing to keep my mouth shut regardless of the consequences.After all , if i was going to a school in nazi germany , should I be forced to sit through THAT sort of propaganda? Of course not, and this is no different. All I ask for is no more forced participation in the program , and the right for students to sit out and protest should they so choose. Is that really that much?

This cause is important to me and I’ll fight to the death and suffer there all of the torcher , pain and humiliation its thats necessary to fulfil it. For the record, yes I was picked on as a child (notice I didn’t say bullied) and no I don't think my feelings are more important than the people who picked on me’s freedom. In fact I’d go to heck and stay there forever to protect their freedom, and if need be am prepared to die for my cause.”bullying” isn't the answer, its just the lesser of the to levels which are the choices being given to us by society. If you disagree with me thats fine , I understand, I see plenty of reasons why you would feel that way. But for those of you who support me and are willing to help and want to know how , here's what you can do:

1) Don't promote or visit stories about bullying on social media , especially those protected by major media stations

2) Don't use the words “bully , bullying, bullied,...etc” and when people do inform them that that is not a proper term

3) Refuse to take part “bullying” related programs

4) Spread the word, tell your friends and encourage them to join the movement as well , but be careful not to fall victim to extremism , or getting over emotional wale doing so , otherwise you may make the cause look emotionally based instead of logically based

5) DO NOT SEEK HELP FROM BULLYING PROGRAMS

6) Stand up for your beliefs and the beliefs of others , even if they're not politically correct

7) fight against the system, both the original and the new. Dont be afraid to rebell. However , know the consequences that will happen if you do and be prepared to face them yourself and not go crying for help from the authorities.

8) Prove you're stronger than the system by doing all of the above . Be resilient. fight against the system with all your might and everything you know.

Be sure to let me know If theres anything you think i missed or should add. Thanks for reading , and regardless of what side you're on , remember to be resilient we wont let them break our spirits as a wise man once said. Thanks again